← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20946/2024bail granted

Dheeraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-20Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20946 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2023 Thana- HALSI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Dheeraj Kumar S/o Amirak Mandal R/o vill - Achardih, P.S. - Sikandra, Distt. - Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Halsi P.S. case No. 209 of 2023 instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 302, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that all the FIR named accused persons, variously armed, assaulted the father of the informant. It is further alleged that co-accused Bittu Yadav and Santosh Kumar assaulted with weapons and fired on the father of the informant due to which he sustained injuries and died.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20946 of 2024(2) dt.20-03-2024 2/2 Petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has transpired during investigation only on the basis of the CDR. There is no specific allegation leveled against this petitioner. The specific accusation of firing on the deceased is attributed to co-accused persons Bittu Yadav and Santosh Kumar. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 16.12.2023 and has one criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, no direct allegation, as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Halsi P.S. case No. 209 of 2023.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T