Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45055/2017bail granted

Bittu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-15Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45055 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45055 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -129 Year- 2017 Thana -BIKRAMGANJ District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Bittu Singh, Son of Late Paras Nath Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Dhibra Ward No.4, Bikramganj, P.S.- Bikramganj, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 129 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 207 litres of foreign liquor. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been made accused in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused of this case and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Further he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 01.08.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45055 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017 circumstances of the case and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Excise, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 129 of 2017. (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T