Patna High CourtCWJC/11720/2014dfd for non appearance

Rahul Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-02-11Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 11720 of 2014 ====================================================== Rahul Ranjan Son of Vijay Kumar Sharma Resident of Village P.O. P.SNaubatpur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Deputy Inspector General, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Secretary -Cum- Commissioner, Department of Home Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

4. The Inspector General of Police, Bihar Military Police, Bihar, Patna.

5. The Commandant Bihar Military Police, B.M.P-20 (Now BMP-4), Dumraon. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

N O N E For the S t a t e :

Mr Raj Kioshore Roy, GP XVIII with Mr Abhoy Kumar Kashyap, AC to GP XVIII ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 11-02-2019 Writ petition has been filed for commanding the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of Constable in Bihar Military Police (for brevity, BMP) - 20 (now BMP - 4) at Dumraon. Petitioner has participated in the process of selection initiated by Advertisement No 2 of 2004.

Respondents have filed a counter affidavit. It is submitted that none, below the petitioner in merit, has been appointed. The last appointed candidate of the general category has obtained 14 marks and the petitioner, also being a general category candidate, has got 13 marks and, as such, was not successful on account of being inferior in merit to the last

Patna High Court CWJC No.11720 of 2014(2) dt.11-02-2019 2/2 selected person. Learned counsel for the State, therefore, submits that there is no merit in the writ petition. Since, none appears on behalf of the writ petitioner, without going into the merits of the submission advanced by the learned State Counsel, writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U