Vijay Kumar Gupta v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.130 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13070 of 2009 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar Gupta, son of Late K. N. Arya, retired from as Station Superintendent, Samastipur Station, E.C. Railway, Samastipur, R/o C/o Sanjay Kumar Sinha, Mohalla-Adarsh Nagar, Road No.-3, P.O. & P.S. and District-Samastipur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.The Union of India through the General Manager, E.C. Railway, Hazipur.

2. The Divisional Railway Manager, E.C. Railway, Samastipur.

3. The Sr. D.P.O., E.C. Railway, Samastipur

4. The Sr. D.O.M., E.C. Railway, Samastipur

5. The Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Railway .... .... Opposite parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : M/S.J.P.Singh,Sr.Adv. & Satya Nand Shukla For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH) 20-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the review petitioner. 2.We are not satisfied that any ground for review is made out, specially in view of the fact that the unsuccessful writ petitioner had retired long before the writ petition was taken up for final hearing, and his grievance was with regard to a departmental examination for promotion.

3. In view of the fact that he had superannuated, even if the writ petition is restored, in our view, no relief can now be granted to the writ petitioner; restoring the writ petition would be a

Patna High Court C. REV. No.130 of 2015 (2) dt.20-01-2016 2/2 futile exercise. We are, thus, not inclined to interfere in the matter.

4. This review application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J) (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) B.K.Roy/- U