Ram Sharan Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15428 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-338 Year-2022 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

Ram Sharan Mahto S/O Lakhan Mahto Resident Of Village-Bakhri, Ward No. 12, P.S.-Bakhri, District-Begusarai 2.

Sanjeet Mahto @ Sanjeev Mahto S/O Lakhan Mahto Resident Of VillageBakhri, Ward No. 12, P.S.-Bakhri, District-Begusarai 3.

Mukesh Mahto S/O Ram Sharan Mahto Resident Of Village-Bakhri, Ward No. 12, P.S.-Bakhri, District-Begusarai 4.

Rupesh Mahto S/O Ram Sharan Mahto Resident Of Village-Bakhri, Ward No. 12, P.S.-Bakhri, District-Begusarai 5.

Manju Devi W/O Ram Sharan Mahto Resident Of Village-Bakhri, Ward No. 12, P.S.-Bakhri, District-Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 16-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 325, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioners are said to have assaulted the father of the informant by means of Khanti as a result of which he sustained injury.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15428 of 2023(2) dt.16-05-2023 2/2 this case due to land dispute. He submits that the injury found upon the victim is simple in nature. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He submits that there are no eye witness of the occurrence. He further submits that petitioners have criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bakhri P.S. Case No. 338 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T