Bimal Kishore Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14772 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -233 Year- 2014 Thana -TEGHRA District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. BIMAL KISHORE SINGH S/o- Dinesh Prasad Singh, R/o VillageNoorpur, P.S.- Teghara, Dist.- Begusarai .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shambhu Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. J.N.Thakur(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act It is alleged that the son of the informant went in the company of co-accused Gautam Paswan and Pankaj Paswan to take toddy. Subsequently, the informant heard the sound of gun shot and found his son in injured condition. The suspicion was raised against this petitioner as the victim has some illicit relation with the daughter of Ram Ekbal Singh leading to birth of baby girl. But when the victim went to custody, this petitioner develops some intimacy with the daughter of Ram Ekbal Singh which was

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14772 of 2015 (3) dt.05-05-2015 not liked by the victim leading to some altercation between victim and the petitioner It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that learned Sessions Judge has committed an error of record that petitioner developed some intimacy with the daughter of ram Ekbal Singh. During investigation it transpired that since this petitioner was a party to the panchayati with regard to the daughter of Ram Ekbal Singh, hence the petitioner has been roped in the present case and admittedly informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence. However, learned counsel for the State submits that during investigation, it transpired that petitioner played active role in commission of the offence and petitioner has been charge-sheeted.

Considering the nature of accusation, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 233 of 2014, pending before the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai.

Accordingly, the bail petition stand dismissed. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) P.K./- U T