Raj Karan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46523 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -13 Year- 2017 Thana -JAIPUR District- BANKA ======================================================

1. Raj Karan Yadav, Son of Kishto Yadav, Resident of Village Heth Madhiya, Police Station Jaipur, District- Banka. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Viveka Nandsingh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Abhay Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-11-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Jaipur P.S.Case No.13 of 2017 for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A)/304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of causing death of the deceased, who happens to be his wife.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the charge sheet has been submitted under Section 306 of the IPC and she has committed suicide. Now the petitioner has remained in custody for six months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that there is allegation of demand of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46523 of 2017 (3) dt.07-11-2017 2/2 motorcycle and torture against the petitioner. Having heard both sides and in view of facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however, since the petitioner is in custody for six months, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the commitment of the case and once the case is committed, the learned trial court shall try to conclude it within a period of seven months.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T