Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16879/2016rejected

Satrughan Singh @ Satrughan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-07-18Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12838 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -34 Year- 2016 Thana -DIHRINAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Janeshwar Singh @ Janeshwar Mahto son of Late Chhatu Mahto resident of Vill- Gopi Bigha, P.S.- Dihri Dist- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.16879 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -34 Year- 2016 Thana -DIHRINAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Satrughan Singh @ Satrughan Yadav Son of Nathuni yadav @ Nathuni Singh, Resident of Village - Jamuhar, P.S. - Dihri, District - Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.12838 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Singh(App) (In Cr.Misc. No.16879 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Srivastava (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Dihri (T) P. S. Case No. 34 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 147,148,149,535,337,338,335,307 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and

Sections 31,41,42 of the Forest Act, the Bihar Minerals Act and "4(1) (A), 21(1) (D) (E) Act".

From paragraph 3 of the applications, it transpires that the petitioners have criminal antecedent and they have been made accused in cases of similar nature. Considering the above, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. These applications are, accordingly, rejected. The petitioners are directed to surrender before the Court below within four weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If they do so, their applications for regular bail shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced by rejection of present application for grant of anticipatory bail.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ArunKumar/- U