Mahe Talat v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, (Police), Bihar, Patna.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.452 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Saran ====================================================== Mahe Talat W/O Arif Ahmad, D/O Maqbool Ahmad R/O VillageMahammadpur Mathiya, P.S- Dairyapur, Distt.- Saran, Bihar, Pin- 841221. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, (Police), Bihar, Patna. Bihar 2.

The Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra. Bihar 3.

The Station House Officer (SHO), Saran Mahila Police Statioin Office at Chapra, Saran, SH-93, Mahnar Mohiuddinagar Road, Saran, Bihar, Pin841417. 4.

The Invesitigating Officer of Saran Mahila Police Station Case No. 70/2021 dated 04-09-2021 Saran Mahila Police Station, Office at Chapra, Saran, SH93, Mahnar Mohiuddinagar Road, Saran, Bihar, Pin- 841417. 5.

Arif Ahmad S/O Bashiruddin Ahmad R/O Village- Mohiuddinpur, P.SMufassil, Distt.- Siwan, Bihar, Pin- 841226. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Helal Ahmad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.G.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-04-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present application has been filed to direct the Investigating Officer of Saran Mahila Police Station Case No.70/2021, Saran Mahila Police Station, Saran at Chapra, to produce seizure list of passport of respondent no.5 seized in connection with Saran Mahila Police Station Case No.70/2021 dated 04.09.2021 lodged under Section 498 (A) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 pending before learned S.D.J.M. Saran at

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.452 of 2025(2) dt.21-04-2025 2/2 Chapra and further to restrain respondent no. 5 to leave India without due permission to leaned SDJM, Saran at Chapra in connection with the aforesaid case.

3. In the opinion, this application is not maintainable.

4. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application in the Court below or before the Court which has passed the order.

5. If such an application is filed, the Court below is bound to hear the same and dispose of the same in accordance with law.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T