Satyendra Kumar Dutta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.749 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.478 of 2020 ====================================================== Satyendra Kumar Dutta Son of Late Banaras Prasad Dutta, Resident of Ward No.8, Village- Kanhauli Rambagh, P.S. Shasti Nagar Chauri, Khadi Bhandar Chowk, Ratwara, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The State Information Commission, Bihar Patna through Secretary, Information Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4.

The Secretary, State Information Commission, Information Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

5.

The Under Secretary, State Information Commission Information Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

6.

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, West Champaran at Bettiah. 7.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Narkatiaganj-cum-First Appellate Authority under Right to Information Act, Narkatiaganj, West Champaran, Bettiah. 8.

The Treasury Officer, Narkatiyaganj, West Champaran. 9.

The Officer In-charge, District Public Information Cell, West Champaran, Bettiah.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishore Roy(GP-18) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-07-2022 C.W.J.C. No. 478 of 2020 stood dismissed for default for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 13.01.2020. This application has been filed seeking restoration of the said C.W.J.C. No. 478 of 2020 to its original file. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court MJC No.749 of 2020(2) dt.06-07-2022 2/2 petitioner has submitted that the peremptory order passed by this Court was substantially complied with within time but unfortunately a document required to be annexed was not annexed with the supplementary affidavit.

Considering the facts stated in the application for restoration, the same is allowed.

Let C.W.J.C. No. 478 of 2020 be restored to its original file.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) K.K.RAO/- U