Jyoti Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16790 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-144 Year-2020 Thana- LAHERIMUHALLA District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.
JYOTI KUMAR Son of Gauri Shankar Prasad Resident of Village - Chhoti Pahari, P.S.- Sohsarai, District - Nalanda.
2.
Dharmendra Kumar Son of Late Munur Mahto 36Resident of Village - Chhoti Pahari, P.S.- Sohsarai, District - Nalanda. 3.
Vikash Kumar Son of Manik Chand @ Lambu Resident of Village - Chhoti Pahari, P.S.- Sohsarai, District - Nalanda.
4.
Sonu Kumar Son of Soni Prasad Resident of Village - Chhoti Pahari, P.S.- Sohsarai, District - Nalanda.
5.
Niraj Kumar @ Lathi Son of Lakshman Prasad Resident of Village - Chhoti Pahari, P.S.- Sohsarai, District - Nalanda.
6.
Lakshman Mahto Son of Late Narayan Mahto Resident of Village - Chhoti Pahari, P.S.- Sohsarai, District - Nalanda.
7.
Suraj Kumar Son of Anshu Prasad Resident of Village - Chhoti Pahari, P.S.- Sohsarai, District - Nalanda.
8.
Dinesh Kumar Son of Late Shyam Mahto Resident of Village - Chhoti Pahari, P.S.- Sohsarai, District - Nalanda.
9.
Bikram Kumar Son of Binu Prasad Resident of Village - Chhoti Pahari, P.S.- Sohsarai, District - Nalanda.
10.
Dharmendra Kumar Son of Late Bachchu Mahto Resident of Village - Chhoti Pahari, P.S.- Sohsarai, District - Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Onkar Nath, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 08-07-2022 This case has been listed today under the heading "To Be Mentioned" on the basis of mentioning slip of the learned counsel for the petitioners.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16790 of 2022(2) dt.08-07-2022 2/2 for the State through virtual court proceedings. Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated time, office will place the matter before the Bench. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application, as the petitioners named above have already been arrested, during pendency of this application. Permission is granted.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T