Suresh Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47914 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -93 Year- 2015 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictSARAN ====================================================== Suresh Rai, son of Shri Kishun Rai, resident of Village- Shivnagari, Police Station- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran (Chapra). .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Veena Rani Prasadd. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Excise Trial No. 29 of 2017, arising out of Excise Case No. 93 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Section 47(A) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 90.4 litres of liquor from his house.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated in this case and at the time of seizure he was not present as he was under treatment. Further submission is that he is in custody for more than one month having no criminal antecedent.
Heard learned APP also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47914 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District & Sessions Judge-VI. Saran at Chapra, in connection with Excise Trial No. 29 of 2017, arising out of Excise Case No. 93 of 2015, subject to the following conditions :- (1) One of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties in the jurisdiction of court concerned, (2) If involvement of the petitioner in such type of cases is found in future, his bail bond shall be cancelled.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U