Dhiru Yadav @ Dhanukdhari Yadav @ Dhiraj Yadav @ Dhanush Dheeraj @ Dhanuk v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18702 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2011 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya ====================================================== DHIRU YADAV @ DHANUKDHARI YADAV @ DHIRAJ YADAV @ DHANUSH DHEERAJ @ DHANUK S/O BANGALI YADAV R/o vill - Bankat (Paharpur), P.S.- Amas in the Distt. of Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-04-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 88 of 2011 registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 384, 386, 435, 427 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, under Section 27 of the Arms Act, under Section 17 of the CLA Act and under Section 13 of the UAP Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and others are said to have stopped the trucks near the Sao Kala Toll Plaza and have set ablaze the trucks.

4. The petitioner is in custody since 26.05.2025.

5. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18702 of 2026(2) dt.29-04-2026 2/2 petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case because he is having 18 criminal antecedents of similar nature.

6. Learned APP for the State submits that from the records, it appears that the petitioner is an absconder in a case of year 2011.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T