Niranjan Kumar Bhagat @ Babloo Master v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30014 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -227 Year- 2015 Thana -BANMANKHI District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Niranjan Kumar Bhagat @ Babloo Master S/o Late Manik Chand Bhagat, R/o Vill.- Shankarpur, Madheli Diyara, P.S.- Alam Nagar, DistrictMadhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, on his remand, is in custody since 09.08.2018 in connection with Banmankhi P.S. Case No. 227 of 2015 for the offence registered under Sections 385, 386 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the first information report but subsequently, on the basis of the confessional statement made before the police by the co-accused, he has been roped into this case, on suspicion. It is further submitted that in all other cases in which the petitioner has been remanded, he has already been released on bail.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnia in connection with, Banmankhi P.S. Case No. 227 of 2015, subject to the condition that

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to

move for cancellation of bail.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U T