Onkar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18170 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-335 Year-2025 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui ====================================================== Onkar Yadav S/o Sitaram Yadav R/o Village-Garhi Mahapaur, P.s-Jhajha, Dist- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-03-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No.335 of 2025 instituted under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 117(3), 115(2), 126, 118, 109 of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, when the informant went on his field then all the accused persons including the petitioner armed with arms were ploughing field. When the informant went to stop them, then all the accused persons started abusing and assaulting him by means of lathi, rod and sword. It is alleged that the uncles of informant was also assaulted by the accused persons due to which they received injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the there is no specific allegation of assault against the petitioner rather the specific allegation is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18170 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026 2/2 against co-accused Kedar Yadav due to which the uncle of the informant received injury over their head. Learned counsel submits that both the parties are co-villager and there is land dispute between them and there is case and counter case between them. He further submits that petitioner has got clean antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial of the case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the nature of allegation against the petitioner as well as his clean antecedent, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Jamui in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No.335 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T