Md Dilnawaz @ Dilnawaz v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14903 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2025 Thana- THAKURGANJ District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Md Dilnawaz @ Dilnawaz S/O Juber Ali @ Juber Alam R/O Village- Maulvi Tola, P.S- K. Nagar (Kritiyanand Nagar), District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-03-2026 Heard Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anil Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 18.08.2025 in connection with Thakurganj P.S. Case No. 81 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 24.04.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2) an 96 of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, the informant suspects that this petitioner has kidnapped his daughter.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the F.I.R is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14903 of 2026(2) dt.09-03-2026 2/3 victim was recovered and her statement was recorded under Section 183 of B.N.S.S in which she has not supported the case of the prosecution and she has stated that she fled away with another person. He further submits that the petitioner has been made accused in the present case merely on the basis of suspicion. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 18.08.2025.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances that the petitioner has clean antecedent and victim has not supported the case of the prosecution, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Kishanganj in connection with Thakurganj P.S. Case No. 81 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14903 of 2026(2) dt.09-03-2026 3/3 reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T