Mu. Durgasati Devi @ Durgasati Kumari @ Mu. Durgasat Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6012 of 2020 ====================================================== Mu. Durgasati Devi @ Durgasati Kumari @ Mu. Durgasat Devi Daughter of Shri Harish Chandra Choudhary, Wife of Late Raj Kumar Baitha Resident of Village- Changel, Police Station- Katra, District- Muzaffarpur (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director Integrated Child Development Scheme (I.C.D.S.), Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Commissioner Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 4.

The District Magistrate Muzaffarpur.

5.

The District Programme Officer Integrated Child Development Scheme (I.C.D.S.), Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur. 6.

The Deputy Development Commissioner Muzaffarpur, DistrictMuzaffarpur. 7.

The Child Development Project Officer Block- Katra, District- Muzaffarpur. 8.

Vibha Kumari Wife of Ashok Chaupal Resident of Village- Changel, Police Station- Katra, District- Muzaffarpur (Bihar). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prashant Pratap (Gp2) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 13-12-2021 None appears for the petitioner.

Petitioner has sought for consideration of her representation dated 19.09.2019. Present petition has been filed in the month of February, 2020. The petitioner has not furnished copy of order of appointment issued in favour of the 8th respondent, so also not apprised this Court relating to pendency of the appeal against 8th respondent's appointment. 8th

Patna High Court CWJC No.6012 of 2020 dt.13-12-2021 2/2 Respondent's appointment was confirmed by the appellate authority on 09.09.2020. In this background, question of consideration of petitioner's representation dated 19.09.2019 is not warranted.

Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to question the validity of appellate authority's order dated 09.09.2020 before the jurisdictional forum.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) rakhi/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date