Ramu Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19444 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-530 Year-2023 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ramu Ram Son Of Shivnath Ram Resident Of Village- Raushanpur Sapaha Ward No. 06, Ps- Sugauli, Distt- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ramesh Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-03-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated by the informant with general and omnibus allegations. It is next submitted that the daughter of the informant was married to Govind Ram about 8 years back and she was having differences with her husband. It is next submitted that the petitioner is cousin uncle of Govind Ram. It is further submitted that the daughter of the informant was killed, as such, she implicated the husband of the deceased, including his family members. It is further submitted that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19444 of 2024(2) dt.12-03-2024 2/2 petitioner, being cousin father-in-law of the deceased, had absolutely no role to play in the occurrence and the petitioner had no concern with day-to-day affairs of Govind Ram. It is further submitted that the petitioner resides separately. It is also submitted that whenever such occurrence takes place, the entire family members of the husband, including distant relatives, are implicated.

4.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

5.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 530 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T