Ramdeo Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15701 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2018 Thana- BACHHWARA District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

Ramdeo Yadav Son of Jai Kiran Yadav, Resident of Village - Narepur Diyara, Shrawan Tole, P.S.- Bachhwara, Distt - Begusarai. 2.

Ram Laxman Yadav Son of Kuso Yadav Resident of Village - Narepur Diyara, Shrawan Tole, P.S.- Bachhwara, Distt - Begusarai. 3.

Jito Yadav Son of Ram Anuj Yadav Resident of Village - Narepur Diyara, Shrawan Tole, P.S.- Bachhwara, Distt - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raj Kishor Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 15-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP representing the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 45 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits so far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned, he has already been arrested and therefore, this application has become infructuous as regards petitioner no. 1.

As regards petitioner nos. 2 and 3, it is submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15701 of 2019(2) dt.15-03-2019 2/2 there are allegations of firing against them which hit the thigh of the informant.

Learned counsel for the State submits that petitioner nos. 2 and 3 were armed with firearms and after surrounding the informant they had fired from the pistol which hit the right hand and left thigh of the informant causing injuries to his right rib. In the facts and circumstances as stated hereinabove wherein there are specific allegations of firing against petitioner nos. 2 and 3 which caused injury to the informant, their prayer for anticipatory bail is refused.

In case the petitioners surrender and pray for regular bail in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, the same shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U T