Md. Arzoo v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18176 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-176 Year-2023 Thana- NATIONAL HIGHWAY DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== MD. ARZOO SON OF MD. REYARUL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - GADDUPUR, P.S. - N.H. BANGRA, DISTRICT - SAMASTIPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases. It is next submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 25.12.2023 and during the course of investigation, it has come that some arms were also recovered from his house. It is further submitted that petitioner was never implicated in a case under the Arms Act and no recovery was made from his house.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner and submits that in the event if the petitioner is granted the privilege of regular bail, petitioner may abscond, on which the learned counsel appearing on behalf of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18176 of 2024(3) dt.17-05-2024 2/2 the petitioner submits that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with N.H. Bangra P.S. Case No. 176 of 2023.

6. One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father, Md. Reyarul.

7. It is made clear that in the event if the learned Trial Court comes to a conclusion that the petitioner, after his release, is trying to delay the trial in any manner, the learned Trial Court shall forthwith cancel his bail bonds after recording reasons. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T