← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7818/2015dismissed

Subhash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-06-25Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7818 of 2015 ====================================================== Subhash Kumar Son of Suresh Mahto. Resident of village - Gilani, Police Station - Sare, District - Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Patna 2.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

4.

The President Central Selection Board of Constable Constable Recruitment 2014 in Bihar Police Sri Tara Complex, IAS Colony, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg Patna 801503 5.

The Secretary Central Selection Board of Constable Constable Recruitment 2014 in Bihar Police Sri Tara Complex, IAS Colony, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg Patna 801503 6.

The O.S.D. Central Selection Board of Constable Constable Recruitment 2014 in Bihar Police.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rana Baljit Singh For the State :

Mr. Divya Verma, AC to AAG 3 For CSBC :

M/s Sanjay Pandey, Binod Kumar Mishra and Vivek Anand Amritesh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 25-06-2019 The writ petition has been filed praying that this Court should direct the respondents for calling the petitioner for medical test.

The petitioner has participated in the selection process for appointment of Constable in the Bihar Police Force in response to Advertisement No. 1 of 2014. The petitioner did not produce the extremely backward class category certificate which he had mentioned in the examination form of the written

Patna High Court CWJC No.7818 of 2015(3) dt.25-06-2019 2/2 examination. On the ground of miss-representation he was disqualified.

The said stand taken by the respondents in the counter affidavit has neither been controverted nor disputed by the petitioner by filing any rejoinder or reply thereto. The facts are such that they cannot be made the basis of any positive direction in favour of the petitioner on account of his being disqualified.

The writ petition is devoid of merit and the same is dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SNkumar/- U