Mohan Prasad @ Mohan Sah v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4937 of 2019 ====================================================== Mohan Prasad @ Mohan Sah Son of Late Babulal Sah Resident of Village Chimapur P.S. Lalganj, District-Vaishali ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur. 2.

The Chair person, Nagar Panchayat Lalganj, District Vaishali. 3.

The Executive Officer, Lalganj Nagar Panchayat, District-Vaishali. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 19-11-2019 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ application.

It appears that the petitioner is looking for allotment of a shop in the market complex said to have been constructed by respondent no. '2' and '3' in Gudari Bazar under Lalganj Nagar Panchayat in the Vaishali District.

From the narration of facts in the writ application, it would appear that the petitioner had vacated the earlier shop in the year 2010. He is said to have deposited a sum of Rs. 10,000/- as advance security money on 10.02.2011 for purpose of allotment of the shop in the market complex. With the writ application, however, nothing has been brought on record to show that there was any agreement between the petitioner and

Patna High Court CWJC No.4937 of 2019(2) dt.19-11-2019 2/2 the respondents to provide a shop in the newly constructed market complex.

The petitioner has submitted that he was pursuing the matter initially and later on he made a representation on 11.02.2019 to respondent no. '2' requesting him to allot shop no. 'C-3'.

In the given facts and circumstances of the case where the petitioner has not even enclosed the receipt showing deposit of the advance security money and no other documents has been brought on record to show that there had been any agreement between the parties, this Court finds no reason to issue a Mandamus to the respondents.

The writ application has no merit. It is dismissed accordingly.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U