Babloo Paswan @ Bablu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15912 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-536 Year-2025 Thana- PALIGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Babloo Paswan @ Bablu Paswan S/O Late Dhurfan Paswan Resident Of Village- Ijarta, P.S.- Paliganj, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shivam Aniket, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case No.536 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2) & 3(5) of the BNS.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that on 09.11.2025, Anjali Kumari called the son of the informant, namely, Sonu Kumar (deceased) to meet. The petitioner and other family members have made a plan and have assaulted the deceased with lathi-danda who succumbed to the injuries.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the FIR it is clear that the nature of allegation is general and omnibus. Though it
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15912 of 2026(3) dt.20-04-2026 2/3 has been submitted that the deceased was called by the daughter of the petitioner, but during investigation police has not collected the CDR of both the mobiles. It has further been submitted that during course of investigation in Paragraph '9' of the case diary it has come that after the occurrence, the information regarding injured Sonu Kumar was given to the police by the petitioner and family members.
5. Countering this, learned APP for the State has submitted that from perusal of Paragraph '3' of the case diary it has come that on 10.11.2025 at 07:10 AM, a telephonic message was received by police that one boy has been killed by family members of a girl and regarding that a Sanha No. 415 of 2025 was registered. It has further been submitted that from perusal of Paragraph '6' of the case diary it is also clear that a mobile of the deceased was also received from the house of the petitioner and from perusal of post-mortem report it is clear that the deceased has received altogether 13 lacerated wounds and death is due to brain hemmorhage caused due to hard and blunt impact on head.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, at this stage, however, he
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15912 of 2026(3) dt.20-04-2026 3/3 may renew his prayer for bail after six months, if the trial is not concluded. Learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T