Patna High CourtCR. REV./200/2023disposed

Vineet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-07Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.200 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-1990 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== VINEET KUMAR Son of Bimal Kishor Gupta Resident of Gaddi Road, Jaynagar, P.S.- Jaynagar, District - Madhubani At Present Posted as - The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas at Dehri On Sone, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satish Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER 07-07-2025 The petitioner is Superintendent of Police, Rohtas, who challenges legality, propriety and validity of the orders dated 21st December, 2022 and 13th January, 2023, passed in Sessions Trial No. 663 of 1992 by the learned 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram.

2. By passing the said order, the trial court issued processes against one absconding accused under Sections 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C., directing the Superintendent of Police, Rohtas to execute the process. The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas returned the said process without execution with the following remarks:- "For further proceeding the same is returned."

3. The action on the part of the Superintendent of Police, Rohtas was not viewed properly by the trial court and he

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.200 of 2023(3) dt.07-07-2025 2/2 imposed cost of Rs. 50,000/- upon the Superintendent of Police, Rohtas, vide order dated 21st December, 2022. The said order and subsequent order dated 13th January, 2023 are under challenge in the instant criminal revision.

4. At the time of hearing, it is submitted by the learned Advocate on behalf of the petitioner that Sessions Trial No. 663 of 1992 has already been disposed of on 10th of March, 2025. Therefore, the impugned orders have lost its force.

5. This Court is also of the similar view that the impugned orders have lost their force after disposal of Sessions Trial No. 663 of 1992.

6. The aforesaid impugned orders cannot be executed against the petitioner at this stage.

7. Therefore, on disposal of Sessions Trial No. 663 of 1992 the impugned orders dated 21st December, 2022 and 13th January, 2023 are quashed.

8. The instant criminal revision is accordingly disposed of.

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J) pravinkumar/- U T