Sandhya Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17928 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHILA PS DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI) =====================================

1. Sandhya Devi, wife Saryug Prasad

2. Bindeshwari Thakur, son of Ramadhar Thakur Both residents of Mohalla - Miscott, P.S. - Motihari Town, District - East Champaran.

3. Jitendra Pandey, son of Vidya Pandey, resident of Mohalla - Jaanpul Chowk, P.S. - Motihari Town, District - East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ===================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s :Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad (App) For the Informant :Mr. Sanjeev Kumar No.1, Adv. ===================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-07-2016 Heard the parties.

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Motihari (Mahila) P.S. Case No.1 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 420, 406, 120B, 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is an admitted fact that the main accusation

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17928 of 2016 (5) dt.13-07-2016 2/2 is against co-accused, namely, Sanjay Prasad, who has been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order, dated 16.06.2016, passed in Cr. Misc. No.24907 of 2016, as submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners, but not confirmed by the learned counsel for the informant, this application is allowed. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Motihari (Mahila) P.S. Case No.

1 of 2016, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This is subject to the condition that the petitioners, abovenamed, shall present themselves before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Praveen-II/- U T