← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16012/2025bail granted

Sunita Devi @ Sumanlata Devi @ Arti Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-02Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16012 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2023 Thana- HULASGANJ District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Sunita Devi @ Sumanlata Devi @ Arti Devi wife of Ajay Singh VillageKatauli PS- Hulasganj Distt -Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Paras Nath, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 02-04-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No. 03 of 2023 lodged on 06.01.2023, for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 337, 338, 354, 504, 506 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against nine named accused persons including the present petitioner and some unknown persons. It has been disclosed by the informant that the dispute was going on between two co-villagers in front of her door and when she oppose, scuffling took place due to which informant got head injury by the petitioner.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel also submits that petitioner is a lady having no criminal

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16012 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 2/2 antecedent. Counsel submits that from the contents of FIR, it become crystal clear that the actual dispute was not between the petitioner and the informant, rather, the actual dispute was between two co-villagers in front of the informant's door. But, subsequently, scuffling took place and informant got head injury.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. As such, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No. 03 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/- U T