Navin Paswan @ Navin Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22845 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2017 Thana- MOHIUDDIN NAGAR DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== Navin Paswan @ Navin Kumar Paswan, Male, aged about 31 years, son of Shiv Nath Paswan, Resident of Village - Narayanpur, P.S.- Mohiuddin Nagar, Distt - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Lal Bahadur Paswan, Male, aged about 49 years, Son of late Sukhu Paswan Resident of Village - Hemjapur, P.S.- Khushrupur, District - Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gauri Shankar Prasad,Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Mohiuddin Nagar P.S. Case No. 167 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304-B of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner has earlier moved this Court for bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 34726 of 2018 which was rejected on 21.08.2018 with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of one year in custody. Petitioner is in custody since 06.11.2017. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the observation made in order dated 21.08.2018

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22845 of 2019(3) dt.15-05-2019 2/2 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 34726 of 2018, petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.-III, Samastipur in connection with S.Tr. No. 196 of 2018 arising out of Mohiuddin Nagar P.S. Case No. 167 of 2017 with following conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and valid reason trial court shall have liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T