Patna High CourtCWJC/8261/2015dismissed

Ram Naumi Singh And ORS v. Bhuwalu Singh And ORS

2016-04-11Mr. Justice Mungeshwar Sahoo2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8261 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Ram Naumi Singh son of late Dudhnath Singh

2. Deo Kumar Singh son of Ram Naumi Singh

3. Dhananjay Singh son of Ram Naumi Singh

4. Deoraj Singh minor son of Ram Naumi Singh, under guardianship of his nature guardian father namely Ram Naumi Singh, all resident of village Sarangpur, P.S. Bhabua, District Kaimur at Bhabhua. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Bhuwalu Singh son of late Gupti Singh

2. Nathuni Singh son of late Dasarth Singh

3. Bhan Pratap Singh

4. Baloo Singh, both son of late Bihari Singh

5. Binda Singh

6. Munna Singh

7. Chandrama Singh, all sons of of Nathuni Singh

8. Haidwar Singh

9. Radheshyam Singh, both sons of Chirkut Singh

10. Pyare Singh

11. Shiv Dular Singh

12. Muneshwar Singh, all sons of late Chirkut Singh

13. Jokhu Singh son of late Kalpanath Singh

14. Shobh Nath Singh son of late Jiw Lakhan Singh

15. Jageshwar Singh

16. Ram Raj Singh both son of Shobh Nath Singh

17. Kalawati Devi wife of late Ram Nath Singh

18. Chhabinath Singh of late Ram Swaroop Singh

19. Munna Singh

20. Satendra Singh both son of Ram Nath Singh

21. Santosh Singh

22. Shambhu Singh both son of late Paras Nath Singh, all resident of village Sarangpur, P.S. Bhabua, District Kaimur at Bhabhua. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO ORAL ORDER 11-04-2016 Head Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, learned counsel for the petitioners.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8261 of 2015 (2) dt.11-04-2016 2/2 From perusal of the impugned order it appears that the court below relying upon the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Paras Nath Rai - State of Bihar, AIR 2013 SC 1010, has held that the plaintiffs's suit for partition has abated in view of the provisions as contained under Section 4(b) and Section 4(c) of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956. Therefore, the impugned order suffers from no jurisdictional error. Thus, the writ application is dismissed.

(Mungeshwar Sahoo, J) singh/- U