Bipin Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18147 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-314 Year-2023 Thana- PAKARIBARAW District- Nawada ====================================================== Bipin Thakur S/O Late Rabindra Sharma R/O Village- Dhamaul, P.SPakribarawan (DHAMAUL), Distt.- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Gauri Shankar Gupta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 02-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/23 of the Indian Penal Code. Prosecution case in nutshell is that while the husband of informant was sleeping on the roof the of his house, petitioner along with her wife ie. co-accused person cut the nerve of his right hand with knife and also stabbed him due to which he succumbed to injuries.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He is languishing in judicial custody since

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18147 of 2024(4) dt.02-05-2024 2/2 09.07.2023.

Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State vehemently opposed the prayer of the petitioner and submitted that there is specific allegation against the petitioner for stabbing the deceased leading to his death. The manner in which the murder was committed and the specific involvement of the petitioner in that incident being the prime accused of the case increases the severity of the offence to multiple folds. From perusal of the postmortem report, it appears that the doctor has opined the reason of death is hemorrhagic shock due to excess bleeding from multiple stab wounds.

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U T