Fulman Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16965 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-369 Year-2024 Thana- RAXAUL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Fulman Ansari, S/o Wasir Miya, Resident of Village- Khutwa Parsoni, P.S.- Kaleya, Dist.- Bara, Nepal ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhannjay Kumar No 2, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 369 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20(B)IIB, 23(b), 25 and 29 of N.D.P.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from the possession of this petitioner, altogether 12.150 Kg. of ganja was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel. Police has not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16965 of 2026(2) dt.16-03-2026 2/2 complied Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. while making the seizure. It has further been submitted that the police who has apprehended this petitioner was not having any kit. It is only the assumption of the police that the contraband is ganja. It has also been submitted that though the alleged recovery of the contraband is more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 07.10.2024.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge, Court No. II, NDPS Act, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 369 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T