Ram Bilas Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 17834 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2021 Thana- ALOULI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Ram Bilas Yadav S/O Late Panchu Yadav R/O Village- Meghauna, P.S.- Alauli, Distt. - Khagaria ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Alauli P.S. Case No. 154 of 2021, dated 03.05.2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 452, 341, 323, 325, 337, 308, 379, 504, 506, 354B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per allegation, the petitioner along with the coaccused have looted the golden chain of the informant and assaulted the informant with danda besides outraging the modesty of the female member of his family.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that on account of previous enmity this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 17834 of 2025(2) dt.16-04-2025 2/3 false case has been lodged. Both the sides are agnates. He further submits that even as per the allegation, the assault has been made by danda, which is not a dangerous weapon and even the injury is found to be simple in nature and Section 307 is not made out.
5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.
6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.
7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.
8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Concerned Court below, in connection with Alauli P.S. Case No. 154 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.PC and on the following
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 17834 of 2025(2) dt.16-04-2025 3/3 conditions:
(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.
(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J.) Chandan/- U T