Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15636/2025rejected

Mohammad Sahzad @ Md. Sahzad v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-02Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15636 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1180 Year-2024 Thana- SAHARSA SADAR District- Saharsa ====================================================== Mohammad Sahzad @ Md. Sahzad Mohammad Kaisar Noor Islam @ Md. Salim Resident of Village- Nariyar Ward No. 8, P.S.- Saharsa, DistrictSaharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kamal Kishore Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 02-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S Case No. 1180 of 2024 from the Court of learned CJM, Saharsa registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(6) of the B.N.S.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with co-accused have stabbed the informant during course of snatching and robbing.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that petitioner is arrested merely on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15636 of 2025(4) dt.02-07-2025 2/2 suspicion. It is also submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 29.10.2024 and petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the petition.

5. However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. On perusal of the F.I.R., impugned order and case diary, it appears that injuries inflicted upon the informant is grievious in nature. Witnesses examined by the Investigating Officer and injury report supported the version of the prosecution case. Petitioner is arrested on the spot by the police.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, materials available on record and submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

8. Accordingly, prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Mayank/- U T