Ramjeet Kumar @Ramjit Kumar @ Sudhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15515 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2025 Thana- GOH District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Ramjeet Kumar @Ramjit Kumar @ Sudhir Kumar S/O Baleshwar Yadav Resident of vill- Dihuri, P.S- Goh Dist- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Adarsh Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Goh PS Case No. 49 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 132.495 litres of foreign liquor was recovered from two house in which 54.75 litres was recovered from the house of the petitioner and 77.745 litres of liquor was recovered from the house of coaccused. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15515 of 2025(2) dt.17-03-2025 2/2 no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is submitted that recovery is made from the joint house of the petitioner where the other family members also reside. It is further submitted that the name of the petitioner has transpired on secret information. The petitioner is in custody since 15.02.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Goh PS Case No. 49 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T