Chandip Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22366 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-243 Year-2023 Thana- DORIGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Chandip Rai Son of late Kashi Rai Resident of vill.-Chakiya, P.s.-Doriganj, Distt.-Saran 2.
Akhilesh Rai Son of Chandip Rai Resident of vill.-Chakiya, P.s.-Doriganj, Distt.-Saran 3.
Jitendra @ Jitendra Rai Son of Pashuram Rai Resident of vill.-Chakiya, P.s.- Doriganj, Distt.-Saran 4.
Dharmendra Rai Son of Pashuram Rai Resident of vill.-Chakiya, P.s.- Doriganj, Distt.-Saran 5.
Arjun Rai Son of Brijnandan Rai Resident of vill.-Chakiya, P.s.-Doriganj, Distt.-Saran 6.
Yadu Rai Son of Sakaldip Rai Resident of vill.-Chakiya, P.s.-Doriganj, Distt.-Saran 7.
Jhariman Rai Son of Sakaldip Rai Resident of vill.-Chakiya, P.s.-Doriganj, Distt.-Saran 8.
Jaylal Rai Son of Sakaldip Rai Resident of vill.-Chakiya, P.s.-Doriganj, Distt.-Saran 9.
Lal Bahadur Rai Son of Sakaldip Rai Resident of vill.-Chakiya, P.s.- Doriganj, Distt.-Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Nalin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Arvind Kumar Pandey(App84) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 04-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22366 of 2024(2) dt.04-04-2024 2/3 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, petitioners along with other co-accused persons are said to have assaulted the informant's side.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries. He further submits that the injuries are found simple in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the injury, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22366 of 2024(2) dt.04-04-2024 3/3 where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Doriganj P.S. Case No.243 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T