← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26253/2021bail granted

Kariman Rajak v. The State Of Bihar

2022-01-25Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26253 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-307 Year-2020 Thana- KONCH District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

KARIMAN RAJAK Son of Sarju Rajak Resident of Village- Dusadhbigha, P.S.- Konch, District- Gaya.

2.

Niranjan Rajak @ Gora Rajak Son of Sarju Rajak Resident of VillageDusadhbigha, P.S.- Konch, District- Gaya. 3.

Bittu Kumar Son of Kariman Rajak Resident of Village- Dusadhbigha, P.S.- Konch, District- Gaya.

4.

Pintu Kumar @ Golu Kumar Son of Niranjan Rajak Resident of VillageDusadhbigha, P.S.- Konch, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prithivi Raj Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 25-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defect(s) as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 427, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is a case of assault upon the informant by means of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26253 of 2021(2) dt.25-01-2022 2/2 iron rod and also snatched Rs.40,000/- by the accused persons. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. Both parties have sustained injuries. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sri Kumar Prabhakar, Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gaya/concerned Court in connection with Konch P.S. Case No. 307 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) brajesh kumar/- U T