Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46261/2017bail granted

Hibal Paswan @ Harendra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-18Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46261 of 2017 (3) dt.18-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46261 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -176 Year- 2017 Thana -MAHNAR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Hibal Paswan @ Harendra Paswan Son of Singeshwar Paswan, R/o Village- Mokhtarpur, P.S.- Mahnar, Dist- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Mahanar P.S. Case No. 176 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 4 litres of country made liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Further he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 16.08.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of above facts, let the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46261 of 2017 (3) dt.18-10-2017 petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -II cum Special Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Mahanar P.S. Case No. 176 of 2017. (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T