Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15129/2025bail granted

Bhola Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-28Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15129 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-766 Year-2024 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Bhola Kumar S/O Chamru Manjhi R/O Village - Rupan Bigha, P.S -Buniyadganj, Dist.- Gaya. At present resident of Vill.- Rupan Bigha, P.SBuniyadganj, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Nath Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 766/2024 dated 09.09.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 310(2), 311, 132, 121(2) and 221 of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner and the co-accused persons are of committing dacoity with railway passengers and also of assaulting police personnel and looting motorcycle as well as service revolver of police personnel.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15129 of 2025(2) dt.28-03-2025 2/3 that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Learned counsel has submitted that in the course of investigation nearby C.C.T.V. footage has been seen in which some persons have been seen in suspicious condition and accordingly, the petitioner has been identified near the place of occurrence. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 30.09.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gaya in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 766/2024, with the condition ;- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15129 of 2025(2) dt.28-03-2025 3/3

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T