← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7726/2015disposed

Sapna Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-06-18Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7726 of 2015 ====================================================== Sapna Kumari D/o Late Vidyanand Tiwary, Resident of village- Amhara, P.O. Amhara, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, 3.

The District Magistrate, Ara, 4.

The Civil Surgeon Cum Chief Medical Officer, Bhojpur at Ara, 5.

The Civil Assistant Surgeon, Bhojpur at Ara, 6.

The Medical Officer-in-Charge, Primary Health Centre, Koilwar, Bhojpur, Ara.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shambhu Sharan Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Harish Kumar, GP 8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 18-06-2019 The petitioner worked as ANM. On account of one day's absence, which resulted in frustration of vaccination work, her selection was cancelled.

The matter was considered by a committee comprising of District Leprosy Officer, Bhojpur, Additional Chief Medical Officer, Bhojpur and one other member and the committee recommended that cancellation of petitioner's selection should be reconsidered having regard to the fact that other than her absence on 22.11.2011 she has been discharging her duties to the best of her ability and to the satisfaction of all

Patna High Court CWJC No.7726 of 2015(2) dt.18-06-2019 2/2 concerned.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of repeated attempt he has not been able to reach to his client to ascertain whether in light of report of the committee dated 28.4.2012 petitioner's selection has been restored or not. In view of such situation the writ petition is disposed of. The petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court in the event she is prejudiced by any action/inaction on part of the authorities pursuant to report of the committee dated 28.4.2012. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) SNkumar/- U