Pappu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34532 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -92 Year- 2017 Thana -JALE District- DARBHANGA ====================================================== Pappu Kumar S/o Ram Binod Yadav @ Binod Yadav, R/o Village- Bhamar Para, P.S.- Jala, District- Darbhanga.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Singh -5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Jale P.S.Case No. 92 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 279 and 304 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is that he was driving his tractor rashly and negligently and dashed one person causing him injury and thereafter he died in hospital. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that FIR shows that accident took place at the turning point of the road and there is no intention on the part of the petitioner to kill him and he is in custody since 3.6.2017 and charge-sheet in this case has been submitted.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in view of submission, this application is disposed of with an observation that learned court below will the fact that whether charge-sheet in this case has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34532 of 2017 (2) dt.28-07-2017 2/2 been submitted or not and if it is found that charge-sheet has been submitted, petitioner will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with Jale P.S.Case No. 92 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U