Shaligram Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7841 of 2015 ====================================================== Shaligram Sharma. Son of Late Chandrika Singh. Resident of Village + P.O.- Sighariyawan, P.S.- Sahjahanpur, District - Patna - 801304. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar.

3. The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar.

4. The Comptroller and Auditor, Department of Finance (Auditing), Government of Bihar.

5. Deputy Comptroller and Auditor, Department of Finance (Auditing), Government of Bihar.

6. The Collector, Patna.

7. Bihar Bhudam Yajna Committee, Bihar through its Secretary.

8. Sri Shubh Murti. Son of not known to the petitioner, the Chairman, Bihar Bhudam Yajna Committee, Bihar.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ujjawal Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent State: Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG-6 Mr. Sunil Kumar, AC to AAG-6 For the Respondent No.7:

Mr. Alka Verma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 13-01-2016 Heard Mr. Ujjawal Kumar Sinha, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Anjani Kumar, learned Additional Advocate General No.6, appearing for the State respondents. Heard also Ms. Alka Verma, learned Counsel, appearing for the respondent No. 7.

After some arguments, Mr. Ujjawal Kumar Sinha, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw

Patna High Court CWJC No.7841 of 2015 (2) dt.13-01-2016 2/2 this application, made, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, with liberty to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present writ petition. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U