Dhananjay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16950 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2017 Thana- BHANGWANPUR HAT District- Siwan ====================================================== Dhananjay Singh Son of Jay Mangal Singh, Resident of Village- Sughari, P.S.- Bhagwanpur Hat, District- Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pancha Nand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 26-03-2019 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Bhagwanpur Hat P.S. Case No.51 of 2017 registered under Sections 120(B), 323, 420, 406, 465, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant filed complaint case on the basis of which the present F.I.R. was lodged. The informant alleged in the complaint petition that all the accused persons having conspired with each other persuaded the informant to purchase a piece of land but when the informant went to the land purchased by him from Radha Krishna Singh, the informant came to know that the land was earlier acquired by the Government of Bihar for widening the road. The informant alleged that the petitioner knowing the facts about acquisition of land sold the land to the informant and thereby cheated the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16950 of 2019(2) dt.26-03-2019 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not the executant of the sale deed. The petitioner never persuaded the informant to purchase the land. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the land and he did not put his signature knowingly as a witness on the sale deed.

Having considered the facts that it was Radha Krishna Singh, who executed the sale deed in favour of the informant after having received the compensation amount and the petitioner has been made accused on the allegation that he is a witness on sale deed, the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. II, Siwan in connection with Bhagwanpur Hat P.S. Case No.51 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Harish/- U T