Patna High CourtC. REV./133/2015dismissed

Ajay Kumar Singh v. The Union Of India And ORS

2015-09-23Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.133 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14033 of 2010 ====================================================== Ajay Kumar Singh S/o Sri Badan Singh, R/o Village-Daudpur, P.S.- Daudpur, District-Saran at Chapra.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Petroleum and Natural Gas Department, Govt. of India.

2. The Indian Oil Corporation, through its Chairman Ali Jawan Singh, Baudha (East) Mumbai.

3. General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited (M.D.), Bihar State Office, Loknayak Jaiprakash Bhawan 5th Floor, Dak Bunglow Chowk, Patna.

4. Indian Oil Corporation Limited (M.D.), Muzaffarpur Divisional Office, Krishna Complex, Akharaghat Road, Muzaffarpur.

5. Director (Marketing), Govt. of India, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.

6. Satyendra Nr. Singh, @ Satyendra Singh, S/o Late Uma Shankar Singh, R/o Village - Mehiuan, P.O. - Gurukul Mehiyan, P.S. - Chapra Muffassil, District - Chapra Saran.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, ASG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-09-2015 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. In the present case, petitioner is seeking review of the order dated 6th February 2015 passed in CWJC No. 14033 of 2010. In the present case, the petitioner has not pointed out any error apparent on the face of the record but submitted that this case should be decided on merit.

As this Court has already passed order aforesaid and

Patna High Court C. REV. No.133 of 2015 (3) dt.23-09-2015 2/2 the petitioner could not point out error apparent on the face of record, there is no need to review the earlier order. As the case has been remanded back for proper consideration, this Court does not find any error in the order. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents are not considering the case of the petitioner in accordance with law.

This order has been passed in presence of counsel for the other side.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U