Mahendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31679 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -431 Year- 2017 Thana -RUPASPUR District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Mahendra Singh, Son of Late Narayan Singh, R/o Mohalla- Rukanpura, P.S.- Rupaspur, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ghanshyam Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mr. Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-06-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 431 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 3, 4 and 5 of Immoral Traffic Act. Prosecution case is that the house of the petitioner was raided and it transpired that from the said house flesh trade is being run.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has nothing to do with the allegation and he has given the said house on rent to co-accused Simaran Kumari and the petitioner is aged about 75 years and has falsely been made accused in this case.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of offence and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and only general and omnibus allegation has been levelled against him, let the petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31679 of 2018 (3) dt.27-06-2018 2/2 above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM -II, Danapur, in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 431 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T