← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15038/2019bail granted

Ram Pravesh Sahani v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

2019-08-17Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15038 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2017 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== RAM PRAVESH SAHANI (Male), aged about 30 years, S/o- Mahendra Sahani, resident of Village- Gudhami, P.S.- Musahari, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sudha Devi, Female, aged about 27 years, W/o- Ram Pravesh Sahani, Resident of Village- Gudhami, P.S.- Musahari, District- Muzaffarpur, at present resident at D/o- Yadu Sahani, Resident of Village- Madhaul, P.S.- Maniyari, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjeet Choubey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 214 of 2017, registered for the offence under Sections 323, 406, 498-A, 384 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, but the cognizance has been taken under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

This matter was sent to the Mediation Board to resolve the dispute between the parties and the Mediation Board

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15038 of 2019(4) dt.17-08-2019 2/2 submitted its report having stated that the dispute between the parties has been resolved through the process of mediation and attached the terms of settlement mutually agreed upon by them. In such view of the matter, the provisional bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 13.03.2019 is hereby confirmed. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner would resile from the terms of the settlement, then the relief granted to the petitioner will be treated to have been withdrawn. (Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T