← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4722/2024dismissed

Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-04Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4722 of 2024 ====================================================== Santosh Kumar Son of Shri Chandrabhushan Ram, resident of VillageWazidpur, P.S.-Karpi, District Arwal (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through The Additional Chief Secretary, Home (Special) Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Home (Special) Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Special Secretary, Home (Special) Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Director General cum Commandant General, Home Guards, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The District Magistrate, Arwal, Bihar.

6.

The Superintendent of Police, Arwal, Bihar.

7.

The Sr. District Commandant, Home Guards, Arwal, Patna. 8.

The District Welfare Officer, Arwal, Bihar.

9.

The District Education Officer, Arwal, Bihar. 10.

The Headmaster, Pragatishil Uchcha Vidyalaya, Khadashin, District-Arwal (Bihar).

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Koushlendra Narayan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Standing Counsel (9) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 04-04-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1(i) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/ direction/ order for commanding the respondent concerned to produce the recommendation of three men committee constituted by the District Magistrate, Arwal to re-examine the documents concerned with the petitioner's educational

Patna High Court CWJC No.4722 of 2024(2) dt.04-04-2024 2/2 qualification and further to appoint the petitioner as Home Guard under the district Arwal against Advertisement No. 02/2011."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondentauthorities for redressal of his subsisting grievances, if any. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U