← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5045/2024disposed

Satya Prakash Agrawal v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-01Mr. Justice A. Abhishek Reddy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5045 of 2024 ====================================================== Satya Prakash Agrawal S/O Late Mohan Das Agrawal Resident of Rai Gopal Sarkar Lane, Naya Bazar, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through State Electricity Board, Bidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2.

The North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. through its Secretary, Bidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3.

The Superintending Engineer, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd, Electric Supply Division, Bhagalpur.

4.

The Executive Engineer, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd, Urban Electric Supply Division, Muzahidpur, Bhagalpur. 5.

The Assistant Electrical Engineer, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd, Muzahidpur, Bhagalpur.

6.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Govt. of Bihar Energy Department, Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Samir Kumar For Electricity Board :

Mr. Kunal Tiwary, Asst. Standing Counsel For the State :

Mr. Sunil Kr. Mandal, SC3 :

Mr. Arjun Prasad, AC to SC3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 01-08-2024

1. In the light of the Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Chairman Grid Corporation of Orrisa Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Sukmani Das & Anr. reported in (1999)-7 SCC 298.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with the liberty to approach the competent Civil Court having the jurisdiction.

3. Permission is granted.

Patna High Court CWJC No.5045 of 2024(2) dt.01-08-2024 2/2

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case and leaving all issues to be agitated by the parties and to be decided by the Civil Court. (A. Abhishek Reddy, J) Ayush/- U