← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31646/2018bail granted

Lalo Das v. The State Of Bihar

2018-07-13Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31646 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -15 Year- 2018 Thana -SINGHIYA District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Lalo Das Son of Late Jibu Das Resident of Village - Kaina Tola - Bachhuliya, P.S. - Singhia, District - Samastipur, Bihar, India, Pin Code - 848209.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anita Kumari Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Asha Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Singhia P.S. Case No. 15/18, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he has assaulted the informant with Farsa on his head and other person had assaulted the brother of the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the occurrence took place due to land dispute. It is further submitted that injury report clearly shows that the nature of injury opined by doctor is simple in nature.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31646 of 2018 (4) dt.13-07-2018 2/2 period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M-V, Rosera (Samastipur) in connection with Singhia P.S. Case No. 15/18, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/-Amjad U T