Saurav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15458 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== Saurav Kumar S/o Ganesh Singh Resident of - Mukhtiyarpur, P.S - Bhagwanpur, District - Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rakesh Mohan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastri, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 91 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 74, 75, 76, 118(2), 109(1) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 of the Arms Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that while the informant was alone at her house, the petitioner entered her house and attempted to outrage her modesty and when she objected, he shot fire upon her, due to which she sustained a firearm injury.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15458 of 2026(3) dt.20-04-2026 2/2 committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 27.03.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner has criminal antecedent of one case. He also submits that from perusal of the injury report, it is clear that the informant has received gun shot injury in her stomach and the nature of injury is grievous.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage, however the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after six months if the trial is not concluded.
7. Learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T