← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17806/2019bail rejected

Vikram Singh @ Vikram v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-16Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17806 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2018 Thana- TEYAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== VIKRAM SINGH @ VIKRAM Son of Shashi Kapoor Singh @ Shashi Kapoor Yadav R/o village- Hulas Tola, P.S.- Tiyar, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 16-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Tiyar P.S. case no. 48 of 2018, GR No. 3170 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 302/201/ 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is husband of the deceased.

It is alleged in the written report that daughter of informant was married with this petitioner. She was blessed with son and daughter. It is further alleged that the Samdhi and son in-law of informant informed the son of informant on phone that his sister has died. Thereafter, they requested to stop cremation of Manju Devi (deceased) until they reach there but when they reached the sasural of her daughter they found that the dead body of her daughter was disposed off.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17806 of 2019(6) dt.16-08-2019 2/2 Report called for from the court below has been received from which it appears that after framing of charge in this case on 8.3.2019 four witnesses have already been examined in this case. The trial court has mentioned in the report that trial is progressing and four witnesses have already been examined.

Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and make efforts to conclude the same as early as possible preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order and send compliance report.

Petitioner may renew his prayer for bail in the event trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period. (Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T