Yogendra Singh @ Yogender Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17176 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2011 Thana- PATAHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Yogendra Singh @ Yogender Singh, S/O Late Janardan Singh @ Late Janardhan Singh, R/O Village- Nanhakar Patahi @ Nankar Patahi, P.S- Patahi, Distt.- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Patahi P.S. Case No. 39 of 2011 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 302, 504, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner along with others was armed with weapon. The specific allegation of firing with country made pistol at the father of the informant is against one Anshu Singh due to which he succumbed to the injuries.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17176 of 2026(2) dt.19-03-2026 2/2 committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. From perusal of the F.I.R. itself it is clear that the specific allegation of firing is against one Anshu Singh. Petitioner is only a member of mob and is alleged to be armed with weapon. He has not made any firing. No overt act is alleged against him. He is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 01.12.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Patahi P.S. Case No. 39 of 2011.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T